
Case History I
I am traveling from Bishnupur, Dt. Bankura, West Bengal to Arambagh in Hoogly District. The bus is packed with local youth returning home from their colleges. In the seat behind me two salwar clad girls are whispering about the need for Maoist action in the rural hinterlands of Bengal. What follows is from memory:
People are eating ants’ eggs, you know.
Really! Where?
Midnapore, Shalboni jungles…
The CPI (M) will do nothing for us…the Comrades are only interested in their own farming and own jobs. We need a Prachanda here.
Who is Prachanda?
You don’t know? The Nepali Naxalite who ousted King Gyanendra. We need more Che Guevaras…

Case History II
Somen, hitherto unknown to the public is waiting for a train in the semi-urban northern fringes of Kolkata. He is just another unshaven middle-aged man burdened with the woes lower-middle class woes. The Kolkata Police arrest him. He is now in police custody. Surreal, but true. This is the leader of the Bengal Maoists; Himadri Sen. He is the mastermind behind attacks against CPI (M) leaders in the West Bengal. He has orchestrated countless kangaroo courts of CPI (M) cadres and policemen, ordering some to be summarily executed. This is the man who liaisons with the Jharkhand Naxalites, the Orissa Naxalites and even the Andhra Naxalite leaders. He has told the police that Bengal should ready herself for the true Marxist ‘Cultural Revolution’. Only thing, the color of this revolution will be red.

Marxists boast of rejecting idolatries, both of any unseen God or of clay representations of that Power. Yet ironically they idolize Marx, Lenin and Stalin. Marxism is the new religion of the twenty-first century. It is then natural that it will have its zealots and fanatics. These new breeds of murderers seek refuge in the violent Mao Tse – Tung. The latter used unprecedented violence in China to bring her under Communist control. In the Bengal of the middle of the last century, Charu Majumder came under the spell of this deadly ideology. Our Maoists are all Majumder’s followers. They believe that India is under the thrall of the moneyed bourgeoisie who will never relinquish power to the poor. Only violence can free the poor from their vicious entrapment in endless cycles of poverty. This is just a façade. They are only divisive and destructive.They are the ones who turned Nandigram into a bloodbath and later blamed the ruling CPI(M).
One last consideration:
Why are young people willing to be seduced by this violent ideology? The reason is simple: in Jharkhand, Orissa and West Bengal meritocracy has given way to mediocracy. In all these states the Public Distribution System is in ruins. Indeed, people are living like animals in the rural, uncultivable areas here. The unique victims are the Adivasi populations who often have no access to basic education. Yet violence is not the solution. The existing State Governments need to take a realistic stock of the ground realities. Otherwise Maoists and other terrorists are here to stay. In the meanwhile, West Bengal can brace for more retaliatory attacks in the wake of Somen’s arrest.
Thousands were killed, hundreds of women were raped. Over 50,000 put behind bars in various Indian jails. Saroj Dutta, political bureau member and renowned revolutionary cultural leader, is secretly eliminated by the police in the early hours of August 5. More than 150 Naxalites are massacred at Kashipore-Baranagar near Calcutta on 12-13 August.
Now India has to pay for the sins committed by its people.
India has been killing innocent people in all parts of the country.
“Recent revelations have confirmed what families in Kashmir have been alleging all along,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The Indian security forces have ‘disappeared’ countless people in Jammu and Kashmir since 1989 and staged fake encounter killings while fabricating claims that those killed were militants.”
When there are public demonstrations protesting a fake encounter killing, the official response usually is to offer an oral assurance of an inquiry, though these rarely happen. If such inquiries do take place, the findings are seldom made public. If any action is taken against those found responsible, that too is rarely made public.
source Human Rights Watch
If you read Atin Bandopadhyay’s ”In Search of the Blue Throated Jay”, you will be aware how strong a united Bengal was...it was neither the fault of the Indians or Bangladeshis that the sub-continent was thrown into such turmoil...the British did us in, brother...as far as I am concerned, any movement embracing violence is evil. The Naxalites are wrong to use evil and so was Bangla Bhai wrong to use violence...
The government has lost ( not officially)their mandate in the eyes of people; they find their kangaroo courts better than Kafkian courts of Indian government.
It is just that even naxalities have got swayed by the power which they were bestowed with and became just like government. It is a matter of pity for the common man who has got torn between this war .
good analysis...Kafkaesque, you mean and as far as the government’s policies are concerned, all pols suck. yack! & Naxalites are just pols pretending to fight for a cause...
It is really amazing that you think polls and elections help people. They are more like palliatives which take away the pain for some moment with optimism and euphoria, but the disease returns after the effect dies down..
And of course you will be well versed with real-politik of this country to really believe in elections.. We really need people like you to show the positive (why not imaginary) effects of democracy.
Rahpsody, you heard two girls talking about the need of 'Prachanda'. Despite we have Gandhi everywhere, we (both people and governments) don't believe in Gandhian philosophy. We want to win violence with using violence. Girls should talk about democratic or Gandhian approach to solve their problems but they were talking about Prachanda approach to solve the problem. this is the complete failure of government not for not pumping the fail and believe in poor people in these regiions.
The problem that is plaguing the naxal-infested states is that of economic disparity between the haves and the have nots, government apathy for the rural population, lack of job opportunities and police and feudal brutality.
The situation is so bad in some area that families send their kids to school for bringing them the food they get as mid-day meals that is not even good enough for even one child.
If they don’t pick up arms, who would? The whispers amongst bureaucrats suggest that most of the times you can’t help but sympathize with their cause.
However, this cause is getting murkier and diluted in the absence of any substantial gains by the naxalites. In fact, the top leaders of the movement have become power hungry and using the movement to terrorize the government and running parallel governments.
Anyway, I agree with Pratyush here. Those who call the naxalites as terrorists suffer from ignorance and deficiency in knowledge.
Give me an example of terrorist without suffering from ignorance and deficiency of knowledge.
We all need not to understand that the word terrorist has always been a relative term and will remain so.
Anyway I have missed the crux of point in all this; about what are we discussing? that whether naxalities are terrorists or that naxalities are better than government or that naxalities too have become power-hungry? or that Che Guvera would be turning in his grave after coming to see his photo here?
I concede deficiency of knowledge etc. but those who take up arms against civilians are nothing but petty criminals aka terrorists. No amount of State wrongs can justify retaliatory wrongs. Sorry, guys am alone here, it seems, what the Naxals are doing is evil. Period.
what gives u the idea that i am not an Indian? & did u read the post well enuff to understand whethere guevara is being praised or not?
And secondly naxalities when started was more for bringing changes, a total revolution; but now they also have become like government (callous to the needs of people).
I agree with you on issues of using violence to settle scores.
Violence only breeds violence without settling anything
But —-
Whether the Maoists are justified in using violence or not to meet their objectives was once defined by a Marxist friend by giving an example of an overdue pregnant woman.
If birth does not take place naturally, a Caesarian has to be done to save mother and child, otherwise both could die.
“Should a social order – be it monarchy, democracy, oligarchy, feudalism, Marxism, Capitalism and any other name it goes by, become oppressive to a point of an overdue pregnancy, a violent Caesarian is just the right remedy” – was how my friend defended the concept of revolution as opposed to evolution in Marxist ideology
—– ——- ——–
I did not have an answer to this argument
After every successful revolution the patriotism evaporates and leaves behind the green slime of bureaucracy .
(Maybe Kafka said that )
Now turning to your point of thesis, antithesis and synthesis; I would like to say that Hegel has been proved wrong as he believes that world is growing in an arrow manner; secondly the definition of development is contentious issue between intellectuals and it would be better if we save ourselves from that discussion; thirdly even if hegel is right then also it may be possible that naxalities may be providing the antithesis of the prevailing idea of state and by that maybe contributing towards a synthesis which will be better for the world. ( It is a different issue that I don’t believe it totally)
Local Opinions (39)
The Marxists, however, would never have the ascendancy as they have gained in West Bengal, had Indira Congress, following Nehru’s legacy, not let Marxists swell in West Bengal for confined party interest of Congress in Delhi. Indira Gandhi let West Bengal Congress became a pack of divided cards engaged more in internal feuds so that the Marxists find West Bengal a vineyard and stand as a political force, namely in opposition, but serving Congress in Delhi at crisis period by dividing, hoaxing the anti-Congress opposition parties in the Parliament.
If you read Atin Bandopadhyay’s ”In Search of the Blue Throated Jay”, you will be aware how strong a united Bengal was...it was neither the fault of the Indians or Bangladeshis that the sub-continent was thrown into such turmoil...the British did us in, brother...as far as I am concerned, any movement embracing violence is evil. The Naxalites are wrong to use evil and so was Bangla Bhai wrong to use violence...
The government has lost ( not officially)their mandate in the eyes of people; they find their kangaroo courts better than Kafkian courts of Indian government.
It is just that even naxalities have got swayed by the power which they were bestowed with and became just like government. It is a matter of pity for the common man who has got torn between this war .
good analysis...Kafkaesque, you mean and as far as the government’s policies are concerned, all pols suck. yack! & Naxalites are just pols pretending to fight for a cause...
It is really amazing that you think polls and elections help people. They are more like palliatives which take away the pain for some moment with optimism and euphoria, but the disease returns after the effect dies down..
And of course you will be well versed with real-politik of this country to really believe in elections.. We really need people like you to show the positive (why not imaginary) effects of democracy.
Rahpsody, you heard two girls talking about the need of 'Prachanda'. Despite we have Gandhi everywhere, we (both people and governments) don't believe in Gandhian philosophy. We want to win violence with using violence. Girls should talk about democratic or Gandhian approach to solve their problems but they were talking about Prachanda approach to solve the problem. this is the complete failure of government not for not pumping the fail and believe in poor people in these regiions.
The problem that is plaguing the naxal-infested states is that of economic disparity between the haves and the have nots, government apathy for the rural population, lack of job opportunities and police and feudal brutality.
The situation is so bad in some area that families send their kids to school for bringing them the food they get as mid-day meals that is not even good enough for even one child.
If they don’t pick up arms, who would? The whispers amongst bureaucrats suggest that most of the times you can’t help but sympathize with their cause.
However, this cause is getting murkier and diluted in the absence of any substantial gains by the naxalites. In fact, the top leaders of the movement have become power hungry and using the movement to terrorize the government and running parallel governments.
Anyway, I agree with Pratyush here. Those who call the naxalites as terrorists suffer from ignorance and deficiency in knowledge.
Give me an example of terrorist without suffering from ignorance and deficiency of knowledge.
We all need not to understand that the word terrorist has always been a relative term and will remain so.
Anyway I have missed the crux of point in all this; about what are we discussing? that whether naxalities are terrorists or that naxalities are better than government or that naxalities too have become power-hungry? or that Che Guvera would be turning in his grave after coming to see his photo here?
I concede deficiency of knowledge etc. but those who take up arms against civilians are nothing but petty criminals aka terrorists. No amount of State wrongs can justify retaliatory wrongs. Sorry, guys am alone here, it seems, what the Naxals are doing is evil. Period.
what gives u the idea that i am not an Indian? & did u read the post well enuff to understand whethere guevara is being praised or not?
And secondly naxalities when started was more for bringing changes, a total revolution; but now they also have become like government (callous to the needs of people).
I agree with you on issues of using violence to settle scores.
Violence only breeds violence without settling anything
But —-
Whether the Maoists are justified in using violence or not to meet their objectives was once defined by a Marxist friend by giving an example of an overdue pregnant woman.
If birth does not take place naturally, a Caesarian has to be done to save mother and child, otherwise both could die.
“Should a social order – be it monarchy, democracy, oligarchy, feudalism, Marxism, Capitalism and any other name it goes by, become oppressive to a point of an overdue pregnancy, a violent Caesarian is just the right remedy” – was how my friend defended the concept of revolution as opposed to evolution in Marxist ideology
—– ——- ——–
I did not have an answer to this argument
After every successful revolution the patriotism evaporates and leaves behind the green slime of bureaucracy .
(Maybe Kafka said that )
Now turning to your point of thesis, antithesis and synthesis; I would like to say that Hegel has been proved wrong as he believes that world is growing in an arrow manner; secondly the definition of development is contentious issue between intellectuals and it would be better if we save ourselves from that discussion; thirdly even if hegel is right then also it may be possible that naxalities may be providing the antithesis of the prevailing idea of state and by that maybe contributing towards a synthesis which will be better for the world. ( It is a different issue that I don’t believe it totally)
Global Opinions (6)
Thousands were killed, hundreds of women were raped. Over 50,000 put behind bars in various Indian jails. Saroj Dutta, political bureau member and renowned revolutionary cultural leader, is secretly eliminated by the police in the early hours of August 5. More than 150 Naxalites are massacred at Kashipore-Baranagar near Calcutta on 12-13 August.
Now India has to pay for the sins committed by its people.
India has been killing innocent people in all parts of the country.
“Recent revelations have confirmed what families in Kashmir have been alleging all along,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The Indian security forces have ‘disappeared’ countless people in Jammu and Kashmir since 1989 and staged fake encounter killings while fabricating claims that those killed were militants.”
When there are public demonstrations protesting a fake encounter killing, the official response usually is to offer an oral assurance of an inquiry, though these rarely happen. If such inquiries do take place, the findings are seldom made public. If any action is taken against those found responsible, that too is rarely made public.
source Human Rights Watch
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 

























The Marxists, however, would never have the ascendancy as they have gained in West Bengal, had Indira Congress, following Nehru’s legacy, not let Marxists swell in West Bengal for confined party interest of Congress in Delhi. Indira Gandhi let West Bengal Congress became a pack of divided cards engaged more in internal feuds so that the Marxists find West Bengal a vineyard and stand as a political force, namely in opposition, but serving Congress in Delhi at crisis period by dividing, hoaxing the anti-Congress opposition parties in the Parliament.